Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Chapter Outlines


Service at the Sharp End: Making Contact Centres Work


Or, how to survive in a world of change with too little budget, too many staff, too much complex technology, tight deadlines and revised briefs.




About


Rob Innes has worked in contact centres, marketing and technology for 20 years. In that time he has made and taken calls, selected staff, briefed teams, run training programmes, changed processes, implemented computer systems, devised integration methods, prepared analysis and metrics and developed business cases for large contact centre projects. In that time, Rob has worked with clients in Financial Services, Telecommunications, Hospitality, Education, Government, Consumer Goods and Automotive. Rob has helped developed consumer and business to business projects covering acquisition, service, retention and reactivation. In this time, Rob is honest enough to own up to quite a few mistakes, includng a couple of absolute howlers but has learned an enormous amount about what it takes to deliver fantastic service to customers day after day after day. Having worked with Vodafone, Citibank, Ford and HM Government, Rob has built many successful contact centre projects and is keen to pass on his experience.


This book is about sharing tips and techniques, advising on what works and what doesn't, seeing past the obvious to the unexpected sources of value and risk in contact centres, demystifying technology and highlighting practical steps that can be taken to lift an average contact centre to a great contact centre and to lift poor service delivery to fantastic service delivery. Things like:



  • Which metrics are most important for improving service levels?

  • How to manage change that impacts on staff

  • How to retain good staff

  • How to recruit staff for specialist roles

  • How to give individual customers a personalised service without over-burdening your IT department or tying your advisors in knots

  • How to keep the buzz going, day in, day out

  • How to reduce the number of hand-offs between teams and increase the number of calls dealt with at first point of contact (first call resolution)



This is above all, a can-do book and is focused on taking what really works, what actually works at the sharp end - the busy contact centre - and making it happen in the most engaging and effective manner. Fundamentally, the contact centre cannot operate in isolation from the business. Consequently, this books looks not just at the ways to improve contact centre operations, but how to best organise the entire business to create the best possible links with the contact centre - embedding the contact centre right at the heart of customer strategy.


On the website there are downloadable forms and checklists, tools and tips mentioned in this book that you can take and straightaway make a difference to your centre.


This book is aimed at both contact centre professionals and business professionals who support a contact centre or who devise the campaigns and projects that run through contact centres. It will also be useful to professionals who are involved in IT, service delivery, customer marketing or sales. It will also be useful to people looking to advance a career in contact centres.

Rob lives in Edinburgh, UK with his wife, daughter and rabbit.


Introduction


Right from the word go I want to lay my cards on the table. I like call centres. Call centres are a force for good in allowing masses of customers to efficiently interact with various parts of the enterprise. The modern call centre, or contact centre, to be more accurate since email and other types of traffic are handled there are here to help and largely they do a great job. There are always options to improve, challenges to be overcome, new regulations to incorporate but to a large extent, call centres have successfully moved millions of transactions from poorly resourced branch offices to large well resourced regional centres. Perhaps waiting in a call queue is less than perfect, but it beats standing in a queue outside a branch in the rain.


Part 1: Conversations with Customers


If salespeople are the eyes of an organisation, the contact centre is certainly the ears. It's often the first place to appreciate a change in consumer sentiment, perhaps due to competitor promotions or difficulties in your service provision. Advisors in the contact centre talk to a large proportion of customers each day and are very well placed to learn what is working and what isn't. Similarly, since lots of customers are calling, it's a great opportunity to reinforce the brand values of the organisation, through the efforts of your advisors.


Chapter 1: Making Contact Centres Listen to Customers


Listening to customers is one of the key roles of contact centres. But is the organisation listening? Too often information available to advisors in contact centre stays in the contact centre. This could be about delivery problems, availability problems, pricing challenges, competitor activity, in fact all aspects of your customer engagement from your branches to your website will generate calls which are opportunities to learn. Often the organisation has analytics capability to capture this knowledge and distribute around the business and from them, increasingly sensible decisions can be taken about products and services, pricing and promotion, delivery and servicing and remarketing and recommendation. However, this happens haphazzardly and this book is about how to improve the use of valuable information gained through contact centres.


Chapter 2: People. People Everywhere


With interactive web activity, self-service IVRs, supplier extranets and the like, it's easy to imagine that the demand for contact centre staff is falling. Actually the opposite is the case. Employment in the sector continues to grow and the first thing you notice in a contact centre is not the technology, it's the people. They are a fantastic resource that create the amazing buzz of contact centres. Managing large amounts of people, especially large amounts of young people can be challenging. This writer has experienced amazing behaviour, at one extreme an empowered advisor leaving the contact centre, drawing personal money from an ATM, driving to an airport and giving the money to a distressed customer who had called regarding a lost ATM card, before getting onto a flight. At the other extreme, advisors selling drugs to each other in company time, using the company intranet. From the good to the bad, people are everywhere in contact centres and the successful management of this resource means the difference between great performance (and great service) and indifferent performance (and poor service).


Chapter 3: Delivering on Promises


Remember Johnny Rotten? John Joseph Lydon, lead singer of the Sex Pistols, and later Public Image Limited. Of course you remember Johnny Rotten. One thing you may not know, Mr Lydon closed the last ever Sex Pistols concert, in San Francisco with the phrase, "Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?" Quite sublime. What a great phrase, and links neatly to the reaction many people must have when service goes bad. Thankfully, contact centres are generally pretty reliable and service failure does not actually occur that often. Sometimes outcomes as defined by the contact centre manager may be different to that defined by customers. For example, if a customer asks a bank for a larger overdraft but credit rules cause the request to be knocked back, that can't be the fault of the contact centre. Don't shoot the messenger. But the customer wants to do just that. This is an asymmetric view of the same data and is probably irreconcilable.


Contact centres are very much part of the connected enterprise and integration with other divisions is essential to effective service delivery. Often promises made in the contact centre are delivered elsewhere. Advisors need to have confidence that a promise made is a promise delivered. How do you make this happen? What are the short and long term problems if this connection fails?


Part 2: Customer Experience Management


Regardless of the purpose of a contact centre project, be it selling subscriptions, helping patients to diagnose an illness and potentially escalate to hospital, increasing credit card balance or checking if a vehicle is ready to collect after a service, the customer experience is paramount. A poor experience for the customer usually results in poor outcomes for the organisation. Poor outcomes can be longer call durations, lower sales, more complaints, higher levels of re-calls, whatever. It's often a vicious circle - poor service delivery leads to inefficiency which leads to lost calls & recalls which leads to more load which leads to even lower service. This leads to frustration for both customers and advisors. On the other hand, if the experience is good, outcomes tend to follow. This improves the experience for customers and advisors and the metrics just keep getting better. How do you ensure your centre does more of the latter and less of the former?


Chapter 4: Serving for Success


All contact centres provide a service. It may not always be smooth, but service is at the heart of all operations. Success in service delivery means different things to different people. For example, in the case study that follows, success for a Redundancy Helpline is not about "average handle times", "first call resolution" or other efficiency based metrics, it's about high level customer outcomes - number of customers re-employed within 90 days. In that kind of environment the government agency sponsoring the activity is more interested in the contact centre's contribution to higher goals and success depends on the extent to which the contact centre meets those goals. For another application, say in a busy travel agency or holiday company, at certain times of the year, there will be large peaks in call traffic and managing the scare resource (advisor time) is paramount - delivering the very best advice as efficiently as possible. A key metric here might be what percentage of customers can be persuaded to "self-care" on an extranet during busy times without impacting average order values, for example. Success, therefore, is a factor of your situation and this chapter will look at practical steps that can be taken for success, however you measure it.


Chapter 5: Content Personalisation


Sometimes it can be hard to just keep things running smoothly (see chapter eight for the challenges of Keeping the Show on the Road) but in today's marketplace, personalisation is one of the keys to service differetiation (along with service excellence and innovation). Serving out the same experience to each customer is simply not good enough any more. Customers are different. Each one has differing needs of your business (and contact centre) and represent different levels of value to your brand. Treating everyone the same is a poor marketing decision and a poor commercial decision. Without knowing in advance what will cause individual customers will call, how do you personalise the service? If ten customers are waiting in a queue, who should you serve first? The answers to these questions can be surprising and customer insight can allow quicker service delivery whilst improving customisation.


Chapter 6: Segmentation and Targeting


In God we trust, all others bring data, W. Edwards Deming

A key facet of any direct marketing strategy is segmenting customers into discrete groups that can be separately identified. For example, in a mobile phone company, one group might be contract consumers who spend more than £100 per month, or pre-pay customers who send more than 400 texts per month and have more than 12 people in their calling circle (number of discrete people they call regularly). You can attribute customers to groups (or segments) simply, by taking one dimension of customer data say, average monthly spend and ranking from low to high, then, split into ten groups, either by volume or value (deciles) to give ten segments that can be tracked and measured. Perhaps a more useful (but more complex) tool is clustering to identify a series of variables (spend, length of tenure, location, age, acquisition source, for example) and determine customers who are alike across a basket of different attributes. Whichever method is chosen (and we will discuss segmentation in more detail later) it gives a basis for starting to target different groups of customers with different offers or routing different customers into different service streams.


Chapter 7: Is There a Relationship at the Heart of CRM?


One of the great delusions in marketing, in fact probably the absolute greatest delusion in corporate communications, is Customer Relationship Marketing. CRM has been used to justify all kinds of nonsense in the past and to delude marketing managers across the world that they have a "relationship" with their customers. Bollocks. Unless you run a corner shop in a small rural village and you know every customer by name, you don't have a relationship with customers, you have a series of transactions. Customers just don't think of a series of transactions as a relationship. A relationship is two-way mutually giving - mother to daughter, friend to friend, but what we have with brands is one-way service delivery. For a very small number of brands, think Nike or Playstation, for instance, some consumers may value the brand association as something special and worthy and valuable and cool. If Harley Davidson can create an image for a community of customers that is powerful enough for these people to revere the brand and even carry the brand logo onto items of clothing that didn't originally carry the brand, or even tattoo the brand onto themselves, they have achieved a status to their community that few brands can match. Anyone seen a customer proudly showing an MBNA tattoo or sewing a Persil logo onto a favourite t-shirt? No, thought not. CRM needs to be handled very carefully and the advice of this author is to remove the troublesome work "relationship" and label the task honestly for what it is, Customer Management.


With Relationship out of the way, we can start to discuss honestly some of the weird facts around managing customers - your most loyal customers are likely to be either the lowest spending, or spend an equal or higher amount with a category competitor. Later in this chapter we will look at how achieving your service objectives can be efficiently accomplished whilst providing a great service to the majority of customers. Note, the last sentance particularly does not say "all" customers. I will return to this later.


For not-for-profit contact centres, CRM was always a strange word to use (although the components - databases, analytics, communications management, customer modeling, and others have real value) as their outcomes are measured in very different terms to commercial contact centres. Health care authorities, for instance use a concept of Quality Adjusted Life Years, which essentially is a way of allocating scarce resources (money for hospital beds, drugs, surgical interventions, extended term care, etc) to cases that are most deserving with certain minimum limits on provision. Or take charities, where fundraising is important and aspects of a commercial approach will be present - you want to raise as much money for the minimum outlay - however, the dynamics might be different, for instance if your centre is staffed with volunteers.


This chapter is not about me railing against CRM vendors, far from it, CRM applications and technology can be tremendously helpful in delivering great service. This chapter is about what really works in a live environment and how customers just don't view their transactions as a relationship. And as contact centre or marketing processionals, neither should we.


Consider your personal dealings with your bank. Is that a relationship? It's certainly not like a relationship with a friend or family member. Try this test: Dear Bank, I have banked with you for four years and never gone over my overdraft limit, now I've lost my job and I'm sure I'll get a new one in two months or so, please lend me £10,000 to cover my expenses till then. What response will your loyalty get you? No way, that's the response you'll get and fool if you think you'll get anything else! The bank's not here to support you, to protect you, they exist purely and simply to profit from you whilst they deliver a service. They are not interested in taking a risk on you getting a job. And why would they! For sure banks can improve their customer handling and realise that they are merely shops for money, but they are still shops - you wouldn't go to Tesco and ask for two months of groceries and I'll pay you back when I get a job. Similarly, don't expect that from your bank. Your "loyalty" in the past is not a factor in their decision making. The sooner we all realise this, the better. Banks absolutely correctly will lay out the terms under which they wish to do business - we may not like it, but hey, deal with it. Just, don't call it a relationship.


Part 3: Keeping the Show on the Road


When the lights go out in a contact centre it can be very bad news for the entire organisation. For example, imagine a Live TV Fundraiser, what happens to donations if the contact centre systems fall over? Advisors being left to tell customers "Sorry, our systems are down, can you call back" is hardly satisfactory. What if you can't even get through to an advisor? Contact centres are so fiendishly complex that failure can happen at many points - telephone lines, database systems, commercial power supply, back-office systems, building security systems, etc. etc. Many of these items can be duplicated or beefed up for resilience, so for example, you can run your database on a cluster of servers so if one server fails, the cluster remains viable and service continues. Similarly, the telephone lines (more likely digital fibre links) can be duplicated to take separate routes into a building, from different "points of presence" on the supplier network and be configured for network level resilience. For small contact centres, the services available for redundancy and continuity are more sophisticated than you might expect and don't have to cost the earth. The key to Keeping the Show on the Road is good planning. This section expands on "planning" to key steps to take to ensure that the customer experience is consistently good.


Chapter 8: Technology


Here's an example of why technology is great. I'm writing this, May 30th 2007 and I get a rollover on my RSS feed panel from Google Desktop that catches my eye. It's a note from Bloomberg - "Wayward California Whales May Have Ret...". I'm intrigued. At the time of writing this was published some 27 minutes previously. So I click through and right there is this fantastic story of a 45-foot humpback whale and her 25-foot calf who have drifted 70 miles off course on their spring migration to Alaska. On the US Pacific coast, heading north, the whales got as far as San Francisco, decided to turn 90 degrees right and enter San Francisco bay and head up the Sacramento river to the Port of Sacramento. I'm not making this up, (see http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aGxLoaddlZoM&refer=us) but it gets better. I quote directly from the article:


"By May 20, they had reached a dead end at the Port of Sacramento, northeast of San Francisco. They turned downriver, then spent more than a week stalled in the fresh water. Their unwillingness to head back to the Pacific frustrated rescuers, who tried to drive the whales homeward.


Scientists fired on the whales with water cannons, played sound recordings of an Orca feeding on a whale and even car- alarm noise to try to force them toward the ocean. Eventually, the whales headed downriver on their own."


So far, so good, but what's this got to do with technology? Well the article continues:


"During the rescue effort, more than 2,600 suggestions from the public poured into a special e-mail account set up by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.


One e-mail suggested using helicopters to harass the animals downriver, while another proposed building a fake whale with an outboard motor to lead them to the Pacific. A Navy dolphin squad might be able to guide the whales home, according to one e-mail. And a psychic asked to read the whales' minds."


"Building a fake whale with an outboard motor". You can't make this stuff up. Bernadette Fees, a deputy director with the California Department of Fish and Game said "There have been some real interesting folks who've contacted us." Oh yes indeed Bernadette. My point is, whales go off track, a government agency gets 2,600 emails with suggestions, it's picked up by Bloomberg and I'm reading it 27 minutes after publication, one-third of the way round the globe. Never has there been a time in history when so much was available to so many, for such little effort. Want to see photos of bush fires in California, want to see funny TV ads archived on YouTube, want to make free telephone calls around the globe, ... well, somehow we have engineered a connected world that allows all of this and more. And we don't even bat an eye. It's like, oh yeah, I was on the New York Times website last night reading about ... Amazing what we can access and amazing that we are not stunned by it all. It's not like we've been doing it for 20 years!


So, technology is all around us and most of it, and this is the really clever bit, is slipping into the background - releasing the benefits but hiding the features - just letting us get on with communicating.


In contact centres, an unbelievable amount of technology goes is in play moving voice and data around the centre, screen-popping information from advisor to supervisor in milli-seconds to save us from repeating ourselves. The instant screen pop, moving a screen worth of customer data from advisor to advisor as a call is put on hold and transferred, used to be really clunky. Now it's a click of a mouse. Adviors starting in call centres don't go "WOW, Did you see that!!!!", they just get on with it as one more unremarkable thing the technology can do that helps them get on with their job.


Without technology, contact centres do not exist. It is a technically very advanced environment and providers innovate and upgrade relentlessly. After people, technology is the second largest cost in contact centre and at the establishment of the contact centre, aside from building the contact centre structure, you likley will spend more on technology than anything else.


Technology in contact centres, because of the capability, is necessarily complex. With complexity comes confusion and expense. It is the land of TLAs - Three Letter Acronyms, for example, ACD, CTI, PBX, WTF, what? I made up the last one, but how many people can tell? This section is dedicated to unpeeling onion layers - getting to what is important about technology with the complexity getting in the way.


Chapter 9: Project Management


It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future - Yogi Berra

Many times in contact centres, particularly at the start of a new project, the most common project management methodology seems to be JFDI. Not a term from Star Wars lore, but a pithy statement of just getting the job done (use your imagination). Sadly, JFDI whilst useful if you need to get the lifeboats launced, is sub-optimal and leads to great wastage.


Planning in a contact centre might involve many people - marketing proposition teams, retail or field staff, team leaders, technologists, external partners, trainers, etc etc. Something of that magnitude requires more than a to-do list and a winning smile - real discipline is needed, from establishing clear project objectives to being rigerous in setting timescales to proper testing. Skimp at the planning stage and the risks go sharply up. One of my favourite quotes about project management is "I'd rather fail three months into a two year project rather than fail three years into a two year project".


Chapter 10: Living with Risk


doesn't do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations if you live near him - J.R.R. Tolkien

Risk Free doesn't exist. There is always risk. No project in a contact centre is without risk but most risks can be anticipated for, mitigated and used for learning. In that regard, risk can actually be a positive. But what realistically can you do if the power fails? The key to dealing with this risk is to have thought about it before you need to actually deal with it. That's the key to risk management - running through scenarios, creating mechanisms to identify risks (particularly early warning measures), defining communication links for different risk occurences, risk mitigation and recovery and planning best defence for an allowable cost.


It is important to factor in an allowable cost as budget is a scarce resource and allocation of resources in an environment of scarcity always involves compromise. It is no bad thing to understand the difference between coping with 12 hour power outage for £1M or coping with 72 hour power outage for £100M. Your circumstances will determine your investment in risk mitigation & recovery resources.


Successful risk recovery depends absolutely on planning, so that's where we start. Firstly, what kinds of risks might a contact centre face? The risks fall into three categories:



  • Commercial - is the plan / process economically viable

  • Operational - is the plan / process efficient

  • Technical - is the plan / process do-able



For Commercial risks, we are looking at the economic viability, will the planned cost savings be achieved, will the cash flow support the investment, will this create costs elsewhere in the business, is this risk/reward arrangement reasonable?/p>

For Operational risks we are looking at efficiency factors - can we support 24/7 operation, how will service delivery be impacted by a postal strike, how can we maintain service levels with higher staff absence, can we train all advisors before the new release of the new product catalogue?


For Technical risk the underlying capability of machines and processes is being questioned, can we support 200 more users, can access control cope with more home workers without impacting system performance, can a server upgrade happen in core hours, what happens if a router fails?


The David Tortolano Zwanzig Schilling Trick


Quite a few years ago myself and three friends went to a small Austrian ski resort called Neiderau. One member of the party, David Tortolano distinguished himself in two ways: Firstly, eating more bananas than the rest of the party combined, in fact, two or three times as many bananas as the rest of the party and secondly, for a little bit of flirting with a waitress over dinner. It happended like this: At the end of our evening meal, our waitress arrived with the bill and we started counting out our cash. David aggregated the cash and counted out the amount due. He then added into the pile a 20 Schilling note (this was many years prior to the introduction of the Euro) as a kind of tip. I say kind of as it was really a device to have some fun. As he passed the money to the waitress he managed, through sleight of hand to make the 20 Schilling note disappear and then reappear as he ran it through his fingers. Quick as a flash the money is there, then it's not. And then with a winning smile, and if anyone ever had a winning smile, David Tortolano had a belter of a winning smile, teased the young woman to figure out which hand the note was in. Now at this point, the next step is critical. Does the young woman accept the tease and make a guess? The restuarant is pretty quiet so there is no pressure from other tables. She has time. The rest of us, David's cousins Mark and Dana and myself are sat motionless, silent but excited with anticipation. The tension has to be released soon, and it is, as the young woman takes the money minus tip, gives David a withering look and smartly about-turns, leaving David to open his right hand (as I recall) to reveal the note but only to the waitress's back as she cuts through the tables to the bar. David looks shocked. We laugh. Crashed and burned.


And that's the thing with uncertainty, it could have gone the other way. She could have smiled, perhaps guessed where the money was, but she didn't. What could David have done differently to secure a different outcome? Well there may be many ideas, for example, 'don't be making fun of me when I'm working you tourist-pig' might be some advice to try? The thing is, we can never know what it would take for that outcome to be reversed, because you can never live the other line - once a choice has been made, you don't get to see how it would have been if the choice had been different. Sure David can try the Zwanzig Schilling Trick again, on other people, on other nights, and the outcome may be the same or different (rejection and misery or acceptance and fun). But critically, the original event can never be replayed. This is a risk dilema, because there are many opportunities for learning and for improving the chances for future outcomes, but as David will tell you, you can't have time back.


Organisational learning is a process that uses rejections to better inform future decisions. You just have to hope the the learning opportunities don't kill you. It's all very well for a channel swimmer to learn that the distance turns out to be too far for them and get pulled out into the boat crewed by the swimmer's support staff, but what if there's no boat? You've learned something, but it's kind of comming too late to be useful. Fly in your Chardonnay, to say the least. That's way we plan. That's why organisations invest time and effort in scenario planning.


Chapter 11: Running a Contact Centre in 137 Easy Steps


This is all about the practical, nitty-gritty detail of running a contact centre, from developing training materials relevant to the process, important points for team briefings, what to listen for when you're listening to calls, developing systems for advisors, how to interpret contact centre metrics, etc.


Part 4: Putting it All Together


This part of the book is all about rounding out the customer experience and the operational capability to create an efficient, effective centre that consistently delivers a great service? How would you recognise such a centre? What would you look for? Check five items from the following list:



  1. low staff absence rate

  2. HR too busy doing exit interviews to look at the absence rate

  3. team areas dressed to support their products / roles

  4. acres of desks, each identical and none personalised

  5. staff using intranets, wikis, custom systems to access, gather and distribute new information

  6. advisors competing to see who has the most Post-It notes around their monitors

  7. notice boards covered in recent photos from team activities

  8. notice boards covered in rules and regulations

  9. coaches and trainers delivering training with high quality materials in a smart, comfortable room, separate from the calling floor

  10. advisors checking facts from photocopied materials at their desks



Anyone who selected any of the even numbered options, go to the bottom of the class. Those who selected only odd numbered options, well, that was obvious wasn't it? The thing is it's easy to spot a bad centre but it's actually much harder than stated above to spot a great centre. There is a quote about happy families and sad families - happy families all resemble themselves but unhappy families are miserable for all their own separate reasons. This is like contact centres - good ones resemble each other but bad ones are bad for a hundred different reasons.


One thing you should have picked up from the above list is there's no 'f' in team. Often the problem in bad contact centres is there's no effing team. Being in a team does not mean you belong to a team. Good managers understand this distinction (as it's huge) but poor managers think "you're in my team, act like it and don't let the other team members down". Yes, I understand, but No! Absolutely No.


So, once the team's in place, what else needs to come together. Well only 136 other things!


Chapter 12: The Keys to the Kingdom: Personalisation, Innovation and Excellence


Right, the centre is running well - technology is stable and serving the business processes well, staff absence and attrition are low, transaction volumes are within predicted levels and so service levels are consistently hit. What next? How do you really deliver a fantastic service to customers? It's about where organisations can realistically achieve competitive advantage. In previous ages (as long ago as 1987) competitive advantage could be achieved and sustained through superior distribution, geographic monopolies, single access to sources of production, etc. Largely, these are now gone for most businesses. Unless you own the only banana plantation on an island of people addicted to bananas, that have no nutritional substitutes and where the importation of bananas is prohibited, otherwise it is very likely that the modern world has brought competition, and bunches of it.


Outsourced manufacturing and distribution, easy sourcing from low cost locations, selling not tied to areas close to branches, digitisation of assets, etc, it's now much harder for one business to monopolise a market and in many markets the barriers to entry have been removed. Many companies that sell products, we might call them manufacturers, don't actually own any of the assets responsible for production. They just own the IP, the brand and the distribution channel. These factors have changed economics markedly. Never mind regulation and consumer power. In this environment, there are two main routes you can take - efficiency - become the lowest cost producer and survive on lower margins than your competitors through more efficient operation or take route two: adding value. It is possible to be a low cost producer and add value but it's not possible to be the lowest cost producer and also add value (as you've taken out all extra resource that can be the source of that value to achieve option one).


Adding value can be done in three key ways: Personalisation, Innovation and Excellence.


Chapter 13: Integrated Marketing Communications


There are many people who argue that by creating enough opportunities to see, customers will get the idea and flock to your product. That is one view and it has some value, however, in my opinion, in today's hyper competitive marketplace, repeating yourself is not enough. It's like the old joke of British people on holiday on "The Continent" if the locals don't understand your English, talk louder. Just as no-one goes to "The Continent" anymore, no-one who works in customer communications should credibly propose simply repeating what you just said. Customisation is key and it needs to hang together across channels. Consumers sample a product or service in so many ways, across channels, TV on a mobile device, video from a website, social networking sites, etc. With these communications options, even plain old email is starting look long in the tooth, never mind direct mail or inserts. The simple fact is consumers expect to be able to experience a brand in multiple contexts and if the communications are not integrated, the user can so easily experience something better. Contact centres have a critical role in IMC - allowing dialogue to build across channels and being a key source of new information to be leveraged across others.


Chapter 14: Advanced Customer Management


Ever see Gattaca, the 1997 film starring Ethan Hawke, Uma Thurman and Jude Law? It's about genetic programming and a society filled with Valids (those with selected DNA and born/created in-vitro) and In-Valids (those without the good DNA and born naturally). The film tests our view on ethics and how far genetics should be used. It's purposfully exagerated in the role of genetics to create optimal human beings. By the way, the name of the film, GATTACA is a a code sequence of DNA using the four letters representing the four DNA nucleotoid bases. So what? Well, Gattaca, though distopian in outlook, crafts a world of excellence through engineering and creates a uniformity in the Valids that is unsettling.


Fortunately, the world we (currently) live in does not engineer human beings to this extent and we have the wonderful variety and richness of current society. Bright, foolish, solvent, broke, permissive, troubled, caring, lecherous, inspired, needy, greedy, weedy, whatever. The great unwashed. Us. In all our vivid separateness.


Sadly for marketing and communications professionals it is not possible to create one product, package it in one way, offer it through one location and price it at a single level and hope to cover the wide masses. Perhaps once there was a world where one type of phone was sufficient for everyone, where TV finished at about midnight on all channels (that's all three channels), where a shampoo existed in one format for a decade without sprouting twenty brand extensions, where shops closed on Wednesday afternoon, where cars didn't have ipod connectors (or CD players, or remote central locking, or websites to promote them, or GPS locators for emergency services, or air conditioning, or their own TV channel - 884 on Sky for the Audi Channel, by the way). Where is this place? Where is this consumer desert? Well, it's right here, circa. 1982. That's right, 1982, not 1882. The diversity that surrounds us and penetrates our lives with more involving and interrupting media options than any previous generation is a recent event. Very recent.


We can easily forget that what we see around us with ads appearing in computer games, millions of people generating avatars in SecondLife, video blogging, tiny chips attached to products like razor blade packs to record their journey through factory, distribution to store and onwards through check out, RSS feeds, DVRs, On Demand Television, is a very, very recent development. Marketing tools have evolved but some date back to pre-history (1982). It's just not credible to market a product or service as per the eighties (though it would be nice to bring back the lemon tank top that I wore to my first job interview in the Eighties, thinking I looked every bit the Beau Brummel).


Marketing and communications today have to deal with more diversity (both in terms of SKUs and distribtion) than ever before. How do we evolve our customer handling to take care of this diversity? How do we make sense of the masses of data that can now be generated from marketing? How do we manage a dialogue with a customer that starts "I'm calling about the letter you sent that directed me to the website where I saw the offer that mentioned the product that I ordered and picked up in store and I'm calling you about because it's not what I saw". Eh? This section will try to create a workout for our customer handling techniques to cope with the demands of life in 2007.


Chapter 15: Outsourcing, insourcing, resourcing, offshoring. What?


Chapter 16: Contact Centre Support Organisations


In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) provides a great contact centre solution called NHS Direct. This is a 24x7 operation to act as an initial port of call for non-emergency health queries - should I worry about this three inch growth on my arm? Probably. The service is provide across a network of small centres across the country and is staffed by medical professionals who are able to do remote diagnosis and suggest an escalation (and pre-alert the health care facility that you are inbound or reserve an appointment in hospital with a particular physician at a nominated time) or suggest an OTC drug course or perhaps a referral to a GP (family doctor) in the near future. It's a useful peace of mind service and saves off work doctors getting endless calls about head colds. Furthermore stuff that is troublesome but not worrying for a patient might set the alarms going for a health professional and swift escalation can be actioned.


This is a great example of a contact centre providing good outcomes that cannot directly be measured by call stats.


What about help for contact centre professionals? What is the equivilent service for people running centres, large or small? Well there is no one service - Contact Centre 24 does not currently exist, however there is a wide range of organisations out there who can provide help. In large organisations, several questions can be answered elsewhere in the enterprise but for small and medium sized businesses, where do you go for help?


Some organisations such as the CCA (Customer Contact Association, formerly the Call Centre Association, a much more honest name) present as a one-stop shop for help ... for members. But there are many, many others that merit consideration. A great deal of information is available on the web, want to find out what ITIL V3 says about customer management services? Check the web first.


Industry associations are a good place to start - The Direct Marketing Association has a wide range of information on customer contact management and also usefully covers regulation and compliance in dealing with personal data.


Business associations like the Chamber of Commerce or Federation of Small Business offer newsletters, online forums, seminars and legal advice lines - access to which can be particularly useful in a contact centre environment - many people, many opportunities for staffing issues, therefore many opportunities for employment law to trip you up. What's the proper consultation process for laying off a team? What do I do different if I have to make two out four trainers redundant compared to if I make all four redundant. Hopefully this is not a situation you have to face but trust me, a visit to your local employment tribunal is not how you want to spend two days of your life. I have and it was painful (for both parties).


If you operate in an area that covers regulated activities, such as financial services, the regulator, the FSA in the UK, will have precise requirements on who can do what to customer data and who can advise versus order-take. Compliance here is a serious matter and requires specialist advice.


If you operate a centre that covers, for example, childcare, you may have to vet staff through a service such as Disclosure Scotland, or an equivilent service and they can provide advice on recruitment plans.


If you need legal advice, separate from that provided by an industry association, look for a commercial firm that has specialist partners in Employment Law, IP/Technology Law, Privacy and Information Security Law, etc. These are the areas that most commonly come up, aside from regular business matters such as Contract Law or Property Law, etc. Some legal firms provide valuable information free of charge. Stop. What, a lawyer not charging £192 per hour in six-minute time slots? Surely not. Well, http://www.out-law.com/ is a fantastic resource provided by legal firm Pinsent Masons. They run seminars and provide online advice and resources for steering a course through legal issues surrounding IP, IT and Ecommerce. Oh, did you hear the one about "what to do you call ten thousand lawyers nailed to the bottom of the ocean ... ?


Most marketing associations have some interest in the world of contact centres as communicaitons are central to both. Some like the Institute of Direct Marketing have more of an interest than others and they offer particularly good advice through seminars, publications, newsletters, etc on how to best manage customer communications. They also provide huge amounts of training, much of which impacts contact centres. As a fellow of the Institute I should declare an interest, but aside from my support of the Institute, I feel sure that an independent view would concur. Please visit www.theidm.com for more details.


Providers to the contact centre industry can also be a useful source of information, though the majority of their advice is geared to how to get the best out of their equipment or software, though, if you have their equipment or software, that's probably what you want of your supplier. Orgaisations such as IBM, Avaya, Accenture, to name but five, have great detail on their web sites covering current products and services, industry trends and opportunities for business improvement. OK, I know there were only three companies in the previous list, not five, but hey, got to check that you're still reading - this section contains loads of useful stuff!


Part 5: Future Directions


"Who the hell knows?"


So said Edie Falco, who plays Carmella Sorprano in the TV The Sopranos. With refreshing honesty, let's be honest, celebrity comment is not known for the truth, Falco told Reuters in April 07: "Who the hell knows?" answering a question about what happens next after the demise of The Sopranos which ran for six series. As with careers, so with marketing, communications and technology. Woody Allan has a great expression and a personal favourite of mine: "If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans for the future."


So if it's all so difficult, why bother wondering? Terrible things might await us in the future. Prognosticate at your peril. Well, peril does not scare me, in fact, I embrace peril, I yearn for peril. And so, fixing a safety helmet to my head and proudly displaying my boy scout badges on my chest, I plunge into the future. To examine the trends and bring forth a view (and many may challenge it) of how service delivery will evolve over the next few years. For the sake of keeping this relevant I'm taking an evolutionary approach rather than a revolutionary approach to the future, so no flying cars in this book, but even evolving what we have today may well seem pretty revolutionary.


Before looking forward, I want to look briefly back. Can you remember the first time you heard the word 'blog' or the word 'podcast'? Couple of years ago? Perhaps a small, small number of you can go back four years, but that's the point. Four years. We have photobloggers and videobloggers, mainstream TV programmes like BBC Breakfast doing a daily breakfast podcast. For the vast majority of us it didn't exist four years ago. It's a true phenomenon. A publishing milestone. A great, great moment in history - thought, type, publish. Not 'thought, type, look for a publisher, get fed up, give two fingers to the establishment, return to work in the call centre'. No, think, type, publish. Now. And millions of people are doing it. If that can happen in four or so years, what can happen in the next four, never mind the next forty. Flying cars anyone?


Chapter 17: Service Technology Options


Chapter 18: Modeling & Customisation


I like golf. Playing it and watching on TV. Doubtless many others do too. I also like skiing, but not watching it on TV. I'm sure many others do too. What about enjoying golf, watching golf, enjoying skiing, visiting cities, photo-blogging, keeping rabbits, reading The Onion, The Economist and The First Post, visiting America and Italy and trying to make the perfect salsa. Starts to reduce the number of people like me from millions to, possibly just a few. We're all like this, there's lots we have in common with people but we are also very individual. For a call centre, this presents a problem, how to you best represent yourself to people with widely differing perspectives and interests?


Well, generally a contact centre is not setup to handle calls from skiing, golf watching, rabbit keeping, Economise reading photo-bloggers. Contact Centres are typically arranged around simple transactions, like a home broadband help desk, a charity donation line, a utility payment centre, etc. For this reason, contact centres tend to avoid individualisation and concentrate on very simple segmentation of customers, usually on one dimension, for example, value. So, "select" customer (those that spend at the highest level) get one level of service and the great unwashed get another (inferior) level of service. This is easy to enable, simple to communicate and operationally, easy to manage, however is a short-sighted approach, if not actually fully wrong-headed.


These days a boadband provider is rarely just a broadband provider (likely they provide phone service and perhaps mobile communications too), a charity is rarely about just fundraising (issue promotion and member get member, spring to mind) and utilities are rarely just utilities (infrastructureless organisations offering gas, electric and other services such as extended boiler warranty, home care, etc). This is the era of the multi-faceted brand, of service extenstion and massive cross sell. So, is the same tone of voice to all consumers still looking like such a good idea?


Of course, going too far the other way leads to operational inneficiency, you can't have a team setup just to offer a great service to golf-loving, Economist reading, rabbit-keeping photo-bloggers, just in case one should call. You might wait a long time. Still, there is value in looking at improved segmentation and tailoring service and offers more closely to the real issues people care about. For example, as hard as EDF Energy try, I really can't get excited about Gas and Electricty offers that involve Nectar points (the combined loyalty scheme with diverse members such as Sainsbury's, BP, etc) however, perhaps if they spoke to me about something that I am interested in, relating their meat and two veg product to something that I care about, might that make a difference?


Segmentation works in two ways. For service and for targeting



  • Managing data across channels

  • Profiling schemes, MOSAIC, etc

  • Heat Maps

  • RCV, CLTV, Scarcity Allocation Models

  • Managing massive customisation



Chapter 19: New Distribution Models



  • Asset Digitisation

  • Centralising or Dispersal of Assets?

  • UGC/Web2.0/Social Networking - What does it mean for Contact Centres?

  • RSS feeds and podcasts & blogs - What happens when advisors self-publish?




Copyright 2007, Robert A Innes

Keeping Advisors Busy (and Happy)


A few years ago in the UK a Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) firm ran a series of TV ads to focus on the quality of their products. The device they used was to film advisors in the call centre, running the Quality Assurance (QA) line. The point was, no-one called - because the products were so good. The actors representing the advisors had to find a way to fill the hours and they did that by experimenting with how far they could tip back their chairs before they fell, indulging in food fights and other "fun for TV" activities. The ads were funny and presented the brand in a new light, however, from a call centre management perspective, the old phrase "the devil makes work for idle hands" comes to mind.


Nothing is as certain as that the vices of leisure are gotten rid of by being busy - Seneca

Quiet times in call centres can come about for a variety of reasons - dips in workloads as a result of campaign changes, reduction on advertising volume, product changes, previous peaks settling down. Quiet times can also occur from system outage, delays in new systems, etc.


10 Activities to keep advisors happy in quiet times


However they occur, quiet times need to be filled and a good call centre manager will have a ready list of activities that can be deployed to fill gaps in volume.



  1. Provide reading materials for interest and personal development, which can be physical or online (intranet)

  2. Create comfortable break out areas

  3. Encourage suggestion forums, often the best ideas come from unusual sources - this has to be monitored and demonstrably used otherwise advisors view it cynically

  4. Cross train staff to perform other teams work, creating more resilience

  5. Cross train staff for back office tasks, creating more skilled advisors and greater capacity

  6. Re-training, particularly in content-rich settings, such as media, communications where new publications or devices, for example, appear weekly

  7. Briefings, get the team together to review recent days activities, look forward to any change initiatives forthcoming, etc

  8. Simple quiet time - if there has been a heavy workload, allow time for advisors to simply cool off, take the pace down a bit until the next peak

  9. team activities - fun can be had with stuff like NASA Moonbase Survival Game or even better, preparing for special days - say a Mexican day, a Football day, any kind of theme day - get the team thinking together on something unrelated to regular tasks. Dress-up themes shake the schedule and are always fun - take lots of pics and post them around the centre and on the intranet.

  10. time off - if an outage is likely to last an entire shift, after exhausting some of the above, send advisors home (paid) as it's better to give them a treat than sitting are their desks getting bored (or worse, figuring out something negative to get up to)



Hopefully these suggestions can perk up quiet times and make as positive use as possible of gaps between work stages. As a final note, it's important that the advisors don't get into a mindset of "oh oh, another quite time, here we go for another pointless two hour team meeting", variety is the spice of life and keeping the mix varied will keep people focused. Obviously this is particularly important in environments with many quiet times.


Why are there quiet times?


Another approach to being imaginative with quiet times is to conduct failure analysis - this could actually be a quiet time filler for advisors! Why is there so much quiet time?



  • technology outage - escalate and develop fix/improvement initiatives. If the outage can be planned, e.g. Sunday night, then adjust staffing accordingly

  • staff resource persistently too great for call volume - are you trying to answer 98% of inbound calls in 5 seconds? That's unrealistic - reset targets for IB call presentation

  • high absence levels leads to over-staffing - high absence is a clear signal that something is wrong in the centre and it could be serious - demotivation, bullying?


Copyright 2007, Robert A Innes

Five Good Interview Questions for Team Leaders and Coaches


Toil to make yourself remarkable by some talent or other - Seneca

Team Leaders



  1. Describe a recent incident where you took initiative?

  2. How do you get the best out of other people?

  3. What would you do with a team member who is persistently late?

  4. How would you encourage your team to meet new (higher) targets?

  5. What aspect of your current role to you like least?



Questions one and two are really settling in questions. What you are looking for here is candidates not shooting themselves in the foot - mumbling, delays, lack of confidence, etc. Good answers talk about understanding situations and people, consulting with people, developing ideas, communicating clearly, etc.


Question three and four are about their approach to people and teams and do they activate the trigger finger too quickly (bad). Correct answers talk about contributing to the team, understanding the root cause, roles and responsibilities, opportunities for personal development, empathising with customers for reduced service levels, rewards for growth, etc.


Question five is as close to a trick question as you should get. Answers like, "my boss", "the workload", "the environment", etc. are signals that this is not the right person. Good answers include: "seeking more autonomy", "limited opportunities to contribute", "not able to develop my skills fast enough", etc.


The role of team leader is critical in a contact centre and you want people who are fun, responsible, supportive, focused, good communicators, comfortable with their confidence but not arrogant. It's a role that deserves time and care in recruitment (as do all roles) but this is the role that can make or break contact centre performance.


Coaches



  1. What do you enjoy most about your current role?

  2. What's the best thing about working in a contact centre?

  3. How would you encourage an advisor who is falling behind team performance

  4. How would you support staff undergoing change, say a new IT system?

  5. What would you change in the contact centre if you could?



Question one should result in some positive statements about learning, sharing, supporting. Answers that feature "I" and "me" indicate a candidate unsuited to coaching. You don't want Mimi in your coaching organisation.


Question two is about loving people - being gregarious, interested in meeting new people, comfortable initiating dialogue, happy with diversity, etc. Not someone who is closed or negative - bear in mind the role they will occupy.


Questions three and four about their people skills - dealing with real situations to coach and develop advisors. This is the core of the role and you are looking for
people who can spot training needs, personal issues, diversion and obfuscation in the face of new challenges, etc. It is about happily taking people through a development cycle and getting a real buzz out of helping people contribute to the team and grow into new situations and challenges.


Again, question five is close to a trick question and answers that relate to more soap in the toilets, too far to walk to the shops, don't like my seat, etc. are obvious indicators of someone unsuited to coaching. Answers like more training for advisors, better information about customer communications, more flexible shifts to accommodate people with family committments, etc. Look for specific and positive contributions rather than general and neutral (or even negative). Whilst honesty is to be applauded, what you are seeking is someone who can see the positive in a situation - limited training? that's an opportunity to maximise the quality of the training we do give, poor briefings? that's an opportunity for advisors to make suggestions on improvement. The perfect working environment does not exist and coaches should be the people in your organisation who can always find the silver lining, always look on the bright side. Remember the vital role they provide on the floor and recruit accordingly.


Copyright 2007, Robert A Innes

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Are you cold calling?


If you make enough phone calls, there are bound to be a few that result in unexpected outcomes. Often, customer reactions or customer requests can be modeled over time so that in any given week, 23% of inbound calls will relate to, say, returns & refunds, 16% to, delivery queries and 14% to, payment queries. There trackable endpoints are known as resolution codes or disposition codes.


Advertising is 85% confusion and 15% commission - Fred Allen

There is a skill in handling disposition codes. Too many and it's difficult to slot a given query into a category, too few and your analytics get skewed as dissimilar customer events are being counted together.


Why does it matter?


It matters because disposition codes are a great way of learning for the organisation. It can be very valuable data to inform process changes, proposition changes, training improvements, IT developments, etc. In other words it's valuable feedback on how to improve service delivery. Say, in the 72 hours after an email blast the proportion of calls relating to "hot to find content on the web site" rises by more than 50% over it's mean level in the previous week, perhaps there is scope to embed better instructions into the email? Or perhaps landing zones active for the email campaign should be designed better to make content easier to find? In any event - this is valuable data and used intelligently, across the organisation it can lead to vastly improved customer outcomes. Often the call centre is the first to know that something is happeneing sub-optimally elsewhere in the enterprise.


Designing disposition codes is largely common sense. For example, in a hospitality environment, clusters of queries relating to similar events - such as "do you have a health spa", "do you have a gym", "do you have a pool", can safely by aggregated into "hotel facilities". Regular monitoring can detect individual sub queries rising - anything that accounts for 10% of volumen absolutely deserves a code of its own. So, for example, if "do you have a health spa" starts to form 8% of queries, perhaps separate it out into a new code and change the other to "hotel facilities ex spa". This itself is problematic as queries that span the date of code change may return unpredictable results, however, it's the best compromise and careful management of code data can save this from being an issue. "Do you have a health spa" queries rising may be information for advertising dept to consider adding "with spa" to all ads placed for the following two months to see if that reduces the quantity.


However, every so often there are calls that defy categorisation ...


A few years ago whilst carrying out a subscription telemarketing campaign for a national newspapers, the following dialogue occurred between the customer and our advisor.


Advisor: "Hi, this David calling from [National Newspaper] could I speak to Mr Customer please?"


Customer: "This is Mr Customer, what do you want?"


Advisor: "Hello Mr Customer, you have previously subscribed to our paper and I'm calling with a fantastic offer of 2 weeks free if you will take a 13 week trial. What could be better than that?"


Customer: "Hold on, are you Cold Calling?"


Advisor: "No, my name's David and I work for [National Newspaper]. We're calling all previous subscription customers with this great offer of two free weeks ..."


Customer, interrupting advisor: "Yes, you are Cold Calling!"


Advisor: "No, I'm not called Colin, my name's David ..."


And there we leave the call as there is no way back from that level of confusion. The coach listening in on the call is laughing out loud having listened to the dialogue. Fortunately, or not, call recording allowed many other people to share the joke, after the call had ended.


This example gives an insight into how customers and organisations have a different view of what constitutes a welcome telephone call and an intrusive telephone call. From a legal perspective, the customer had cancelled a previous subscription but had not requested to be removed from future communication programmes, therefore the re-solicitation programme was valid. The customer perspective, is that they have cancelled their subscription, and therefore, their association with the organisation.


It's like direct mail - if an offer arrives in the post, addressed correctly for a service or product that you are currently considering, or for something you covet, then the communication largely has value and is accepted as such - say an alternative motor insurance quote that arrives one month prior to renewal time, with all of your details correct. However, if the offer arrives, four months into your contract, with the wrong details, it's junk mail.


Like direct mail, so with telephone calls. If the call is expected and welcomed, then a positive reception awaits, if not, then there are a spectrum of possible outcomes - from mild interest through ambivilance and annoyance all the way to "screamer". That's the term for a customer who goes off on one - "he's going SAVAGE"


Tipping the odds of Successful Outcomes in your favour



  1. Respect privacy and opt-out requests absolutely

  2. Do not purchase data for which the provenance is unproven - there is a lot of seriously dodgy data out there - a colleague has been offered 1.9 million credit card customers, from a bank's backup system. Yes, seriously.

  3. Use telemarketing discriminately, rather than blanket calling (which just doesn't work any more)

  4. Get the data right. This is basic but often data used for telemarketing is poor. With so many data cleaning and enrichment options available, there is really no excuse for getting this wrong

  5. Personalise the offer - make any communication talk to the specific needs, wants, motivations of the customer as an individual - "as someone who recently bought our new XTC300 Driver" rather than "as someone who is interested in golf", etc.

  6. Train, train and train again. And then coach. Familiarity with material, experience of actual customer behaviour, first hand experience of the product / service do wonders for an advisor's confidence, and hence ability to engage customers.




Copyright 2007, Robert A Innes

Standardising Technology across a network of Contact Centres


For enterprise clients, one or two contact centres is unlikely to meet the demand from customers for service requests. Often, in large markets, an enterprise may well have ten or more contact centres. This is to do with the difficulties in placing all staff together on one massive contact centre.


In these matters the only certainty is that nothing is certain - Pliny the Elder

Operationally, it would be difficult to organise a call centre with many thousands of staff and as a location it would offer no resilience to the business. Specifically:



  • it's hard to recruit more than 1000 contact centre staff in all but the very largest of locations - bear in mind that yours will not be the only employer in an area and in areas with high contact centre penetration, competition for good staff can be fierce

  • limits on organisation's ability to manage 3000 people on one site

  • building logistics complexity increases beyond a certain size - around a thousand seats

  • reslience is nill if all staff are in one place

  • for 1000 seats, if you staff more than one shift (common) then you are looking for not 1000 staff in a location but perhaps 2000 or 3000 - that will place a burden on your HR resources and external employment agencies



For these reasons and more, it is uncommon to find individual contact centres above 1,200 seats and 400 to 600 would be a much more common maximum size. For some organisations, such as Vodafone in the UK with over 7,000 seats, this means several locations.


If multiple locations are reality, how do you make it work? Well from a data perspective, it's relatively straightforword to "pipe" data applications into different locations from a central hub. Companies such as Citrix specialise in enabling remote operation. The voice environment is more difficult because organisations often have a mix of call centre technologies - different switches, different ACDs, different voice recorders, etc. It's often due to mergers and acquisitions where differing technologies build up as rival firms get purchased. Or it could be due to a deliberate strategy to not have too much reliance on one provider. Often, a large part of an organisation's contact centre estate is in the hands of outsourcers - and their technology will often be different to the brands they serve. Whatever the cause, dissimilar technologies are a reality for many organisations and it's usually easier to normalise the data environment, but the voice environment is harder because mostly, the key serving technologies are premises based - i.e. the reside in the location where service is delivered. To get round this, organisations look at a variety of normalising technologies:



  • homogeonising CTI (Computer Telephony Integration) technology - plugs into each physical switch and allows it logically to operate in harmony with dissimilar switches

  • hosting technology to move away from premises based equipment to a network solution - piping in services from a remote location

  • workstream organisation - moving projects from the workstack to locations where the volume can be comfortably contained without overspill to other locations

  • progressive standardisation - progressively refreshing eqipment which an agreed corporate standard

  • deploying more self-service technologies - at a central point make investments in self-service to draw more transactions to the web, push data capture requirements to customers (form-filling online) etc and reduce the transaction burden across the estate



Which strategy to adopt?


Selecting the correct option from the above list is hard and largely depends on the business requirements, however, it would not be uncommon for a strategy to involve three of the above options and often all of the options in the one strategy. Say, to host IVR operations for the group centrally, to reorganise projects to place them in contained areas, change procurement policy to govern new purchases and accellerate technology refresh, invest in more self-service technology and process redesign and at the same time deploying CTI solutions to allow multiple physical switches to operate as one logical switch. Needless to say, this is a complex strategy, but it may well be the only way forward. Hosting everything may not be an option due to the existing investment in technology, CTI may be good for some services (switch integration) but may be poorer at others (staff effectiveness metrics), rationalising the workstack can only go so far - if you need to handle 50K calls per day, then you need to handle them regardless if only 40K per day capacity exists in your preferred sites, and customers may reject moves to self-service options or perhaps self-service leads to other, new transactions (the law of unintended consequences)


Alternatively, an organisation may enter a large outsourcing deal with a large provider - IBM, EDS, etc. and pass the burden for technology refresh to them in exchange for a seven year contract to run the show.


6 things to consider before deciding



  1. Have we exhausted all possible options for simplification, clarification, rationalisation and automation - if not, dig further, no point adding new technology to a bad process - get the process right, then technologise

  2. Can suppliers be persuaded to engage more in exchange for a contract extension? Perhaps there is appetite at suppliers to take on more risk and complexity in exchange for a bigger share of the long term pot

  3. What does the future hold for customer interactions - are there more transactions on the way or is the transaction load stable? Will new services require ever more complex technology innovation or are needs currently adequately met?

  4. What technologies are on show at tradeshows and at supplier previews? Perhaps putting up with inconvenience for 18 more months to then deploy an interesting new technology once it has been market tested - this could save short term investment to direct to other deserving causes and lead to a smarter and slicker solution for the future

  5. Are there regulatory issues that mean there is a pressing need for reform?

  6. Are there commercial disadvantages compared to best in class - e.g. if processing time for a high volume process stream is 30% higher than your prime competitor then this probably deserves attention ahead of other transactions



Bear in mind that technology is not a silver bullet for all organisation problems. The greater the time spent planning and thinking about customers always pays dividends by yielding better technology projects. At the same time some pragmatism is required with regard to over-analysis.


Copyright 2007, Robert A Innes

Book Index


Service at the Sharp End: Making Contact Centres Work


Or, how to survive in a world of change with too little budget, too many staff, too much complex technology, tight deadlines and revised briefs.


Book Index


Part 1: Conversations with Customers



  • Chapter 1: Making Contact Centres Listen to Customers


    • One Erlang or Two? Sizing the call part of the contact centre

    • Honey, I srunk the contact centre! Shrinkage and Occupancy

    • Sizing the contact centre - email, mail, other traffic

    • Queues and routing technology

    • Contact Strategy development



  • Chapter 2: People. People Everywhere


    • Motivation and Development

    • A Sense of Team

    • Matching Staff to Projects

    • Recruiting for secure positions

    • Super Agents! Subject Matter Experts and escalation

    • Maintaining Motivation over the Long Term

    • Dealing with Change

    • Promoting from Within

    • Introducing Management from External Source

    • Implant Managers

    • What can you tell from a recruitment ad for advisors?



  • Chapter 3: Delivering on Promises


    • Compliance

    • Quality Assurance

    • Back Office linkage

    • Regular Data Feeds

    • Reporting to the Business





Part 2: Customer Experience Management



  • Chapter 4: Serving for Success


    • Complaint handling

    • Stultifying standards-based approach - if it says 72 hours, we're bloody well going to take 72 hours - that's NOT service

    • Customer Selection - why it's right to deliver different service levels to different customers

    • Staff rewards

    • Self service augmentation and promotion to customers



  • Chapter 5: Content Personalisation


    • Personalisation as a source of differentiation

    • Commercial rationalisation

    • Using one channel's results to feed another channel's activity

    • What to personalise?



  • Chapter 6: Segmentation and Targeting

  • Chapter 7: Is There a Relationship at the Heart of CRM?


    • The Idea Behind CRM

    • What Relationships mean to Customers

    • Customers never see themselves in a relationship with a bank

    • Customers might see themselves in a relationship with Harley Davidson, but few other brands qualify - test #1 How many customers have Capital One tattooed on their shoulder?

    • Sensibly using CRM to make the operation effective and commercially viable

    • Sensibly using CRM to delivery a customer experience that encourages more of the outcomes you want

    • Understand exactly who you are set up to deliver a great service to





Part 3: Keeping the Show on the Road



  • Chapter 8: Technology


    • KTSR

    • Legacy Integration

    • CTI, IVR, ACD, Call Recording

    • Root Cause Analysis - Verint

    • PBE or Hosting



  • Chapter 9: Project Management


    • BDUF / Agile

    • MOSCOW

    • Involving the right people in the project

    /

  • Chapter 10: Living with Risk


    • Identifying Risk

    • Project, Operation, Commercial Risk

    • Recognising Risk and dealing with it

    • Business Continuity



  • Chapter 11: Running a Contact Centre in 137 Easy Steps


    • Scheduling

    • Recruitment, Induction, Training, Development & Retention

    • They say you can never be too thin or too rich. Is Keira Knightley too thin and not rich enough? Who cares, in contact centres, you can never spend too much time developing staff. I know this article looked like it was heading for celebrity-mag territory, which might have been fun (if vacuous), but hey, this is a book about contact centres and some of this content is going to sound dull compared to Paris Hilton selecting a new brand of shoe. The title on the cover should have alerted you to the likely direction. So, staffing a contact centre. Let's she what worthy stuff we can find.


      It really is true, you can never spend enough time developing staff. There are several reasons for this. Firstly cross-training. This allows a wider team of people to gain skills to complete a wider range of transactions. Why's that a good thing? Well, for one it gives more resilience so that if customers call with specific questions there is a better chance of finding advisors who can answer correctly. It's also good because the more advisors who are trained across multiple skills, the easier it is to meet service levels as you don't need to worry about ring-fencing resources in case calls come in about a specialist, in times of staff shortage or peak load, you will achieve higher usage rates (and hence more efficiency) as the level of cross-training increases.


      Secondly, with today's products and services being increasingly content-led - take mobile phones, 10 years ago there were fewer devices and they could do less. Now there are hundreds of devices, most with cameras, able to view TV, receive email, browse the web. The complexity is increasing and training provides advisors with more current information, enhanced skill and confidence fielding more questions. It's great for confidence becuase it reduces the number of times an advisor needs to check a fact, refer to a colleague, escalate to a supervisor or hand-off to a subject matter expert or another team. These are all drags on efficiency and affect advisor confidence which dirctly translates into service performance.


      Thirdly, advisor satisfaction. Holding roadshows, seminars, training, coaching, etc. adds variety and substance to a role and gives confidence that an individual is developing their skills to improve their future job prospects, and to aid them in doing their job better. This creates good outcomes: lower absence, lower shrinkage and longer tenure. Retention of good advisors is so important - the effort and cost it takes to find, recruit, induct and train a new person to the level of a leaver is very expensive. Calculate the full cost in your centre and you will quickly see that advisor retention activities have an incredibly high return on investment. Losing advisors in the three/four month period is particularly expensive as that's the point when they really start to become useful having spent the first 100 days or so learning the job. If they then leave, you've thrown away several thousand pounds - go do the addition yourself. This is often a hidden cost in contact centres.


      Fourthly, for service development. Advisors who are used to learning new topics and used to new content, are better at accepting ... new topics and new content, so when you roll out new projects, guess what, teams that regularly get briefings on changes deal with change much easier. A public sector environment where a job changes little in three years is a hard place to introduce change compared to a fast moving centre, all other things being equal. Change is always difficult but if staff resist all changes, then it's really tough. And resistence to change builds up barriers and resentment and creates negative energy in teams. This translates directly into to negative outcomes - longer wrap-up times, higher absence levels, longer wait times for customers, etc. So the more appropriate training, the more engaged the advisors, the easier service management becomes.


      For all of these reasons, training is hugely important to improving outcomes. It can be more impactful than a small increase in staff rewards.



      easier it is to crosstrain, content refreshing accellerating, retention, service development
    • Team structure

    • Briefing in Projects

    • Service Levels - Measurement Performance and hitting targets

    • Coaching and Performance Management

    • Knowledge sharing and escalation to SMEs

    • Maintaining knowledge bases and feeding back to training sessions

    • What challenges do "no paper, no pens" environments create





Part 4: Putting it All Together



  • Chapter 12: The Keys to the Kingdom: Personalisation, Excellence and Innovation


    • Sources of service differentiation: personalisation, excellence and innovation



  • Chapter 13: Integrated Marketing Communications


    • Campaign management across channels

    • Creating a sense of flow across channels

    • Database Management



  • Chapter 14: Advanced Customer Management


    • Anticipating Needs

    • Progressive Disclosure of Information - JIT data



  • Chapter 15: Outsourcing, insourcing, resourcing, offshoring. What?

  • Chapter 16: Contact Centre Support Organisations


    • DMA, CCA, IDM, The DMA





Part 5: Future Directions



  • Chapter 17: Service Technology Options


    • Moving to IP

    • Video Contact Centre

    • Business Intelligence

    • Software as a service / hosted applications



  • Chapter 18: Modeling & Customisation


    • Managing data across channels

    • Profiling schemes, MOSAIC, etc

    • Heat Maps

    • RCV, CLTV, Scarcity Allocation Models

    • Managing massive customisation



  • Chapter 19: New Distribution Models


    • Asset Digitisation

    • Centralising or Dispersal of Assets?

    • UGC/Web2.0/Social Networking - What does it mean for Contact Centres?

    • RSS feeds and podcasts & blogs - What happens when advisors self-publish?





Copyright 2007, Robert A Innes

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Observations on Customer Intelligence Data Integration


Merchants Global Contact Centre Benchmarking Report 2006


Each year Merchants (part of Dimension Data) conduct an authoritative piece of research into best practice in contact centres. What is surprising is the continued gap between best performance and average performance for some very critical metrics. Take integration of key customer intelligence (CI) data, or how well integrated are core business systems and the contact centre? Frequently CI data is not shared between contact centre and other parts of the business (either from the contact centre or to the call centre).


Too bad the only people who know how to run the country are busy driving cabs and cutting hair - George Burns

According to the benchmarking report on CI integration elements such as: delivery tracking, customer correspondence, pricing and product specification, performance varies from one in ten to one in three contact centres that have no integration whatsoever (relying on manual activities). About half again have access but not easily. This is surprising but helps to explain why service experiences can be disjointed.


So What?


This is a huge missed opportunity for improved efficiency and improved effectiveness. Customer exectations are firmly set as an organisation that has equal intelligence at all touchpoints. Frequently, equal intelligence means equally low intelligence, unfortunately. When a brand is good at integrated communications, customers expect that that high standard can be achieved repeatedly and the bar for the industry is raised. Consequently if a customer requests something of a staff member in a branch office, that customer expects that a contact centre advisor knows of that request. Easy to say, hard to do. But increasingly customers expect it.


Similarly with joined up communications, if you send a customer a letter inviting them to visit a website, you should expect that some will then call or email a contact centre and expect the adviser to a) know about the letter, and b) know about the website content. If you think about it from a customer’s perspective this makes sense. Don’t we all expect that? If you think about it from an systems integration perspective it makes your toes curl – don’t customers realise how hard it is to get seventeen different systems to talk to each other?!!! The trouble is, the customer doesn’t care how hard it is to get different data repositories, in different formats, in different locations to talk to one another. They simply expect that it does. Not from a reductionist, XML feed level, but at a common sense level – you keep trumpeting how good you are, surely you can keep track of all of my data. And they’re right.


Copyright 2007 Robert A Innes